<entry id="2311966" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2451660</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>マイナスイオン</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>マイナス・イオン</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<lsource ls_wasei="y">minus ion</lsource>
<gloss>(atmospheric) negative ions (supposedly having positive health effects)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2009-05-24 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-05-11 11:12:51" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;マイナス・イオン&lt;/reb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-09-07 16:07:16" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_refs>daijs
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%9E%E3%82%A4%E3%83%8A%E3%82%B9%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AA%E3%83%B3#%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E3%81%A7%E3%81%AE%E5%A4%A7%E8%A1%86%E7%9A%84%E3%81%AA%E3%83%9E%E3%82%A4%E3%83%8A%E3%82%B9%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AA%E3%83%B3%E3%83%96%E3%83%BC%E3%83%A0</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +13 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;negative ion&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;negative ion (considered to be good for health)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-09-07 20:56:04" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Daijisen flags it as 疑似科学. I don't think it should be in the gloss.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5:【化】 a negative ion.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;field&gt;&amp;chem;&lt;/field&gt;
@@ -13 +14 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;negative ion (considered to be good for health)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;negative ion&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-09-08 00:23:59" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>That's the point. The word is only used inpseudoscientific context, unlike the english.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-09-08 02:06:06" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Maybe this. It gets some use outside 疑似科学.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>プログレッシブ: a negatively charged ion; a negative ion</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +15,4 @@
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;atmospheric negative ions (esp. in pseudoscientific contexts)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-09-08 13:38:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>&gt; It gets some use outside 疑似科学.

Does it, really? I looked at 10 google links that had scientific-looking illustrations and the explanations offered on those pages were all bollocks.

プラスイオン cause cell ageing, sore shoulders, cancer, and everything else bad.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijs: 学術用語ではなく</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-09-09 00:45:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Looks like the JEs are wrong here.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-&lt;field&gt;&amp;chem;&lt;/field&gt;
@@ -14,5 +13 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;negative ion&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;atmospheric negative ions (esp. in pseudoscientific contexts)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;(atmospheric) negative ions (supposedly having positive health effects)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-09-09 01:08:34" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The "proper" terms barely get used.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>アニオン	21716	1.6%
陰イオン	31767	2.4%
マイナスイオン	1283628	95.8%
マイナス・イオン	3334	0.2%</upd_refs>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>