JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help | Doc
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1009780 Active (id: 2298931)
<entry id="2298931" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1009780</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>に就いて</keb>
<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>に就て</keb>
<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>について</reb>
<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<gloss>about</gloss>
<gloss>on</gloss>
<gloss>regarding</gloss>
<gloss>concerning</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<gloss>per</gloss>
<gloss>for every</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2012-04-11 14:17:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nils Roland Barth</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>* Split into 2 senses – “concerning” and “per” (“concerning” is v. common/basic)
* Mark に就て as [io] (it’s v. poor form to swallow part of the inflection!)
* Delete glosses “along; under”,
which I can’t make sense off – they don’t seem to go with these senses (except *very* loosely, in which case they are rather poor or loose wording), and dicts don’t give other senses.
(I came here from editing につき – related cross-references)</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5 daijr split as 2 senses</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;io;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -20,3 +21,7 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;along&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;under&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;per&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;regarding&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;exp;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;per (e.g. 100 yen per person)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;for every&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-04-11 23:09:01" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-09-05 03:23:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus</upd_name>
<upd_detl>is both this and 就いて necessary?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-09-05 05:22:05" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>meikyo (and others i'm sure) has both</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-09-13 13:18:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>not in gg5, koj and daijs
(koj has the entry as 就いて)</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;iK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-09-13 22:39:45" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-10-13 12:48:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>G n-grams:
について	398114746
に付いて	  1475241
に就いて	   331721
に就て	    84446</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+&lt;ke_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
@@ -16,0 +18 @@
+&lt;re_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-10-13 21:55:13" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-21 23:47:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>に就いて	331721	0.1%
に就て	84446	0.0%
に付いて	1475241	0.4%
について	398114746	99.5%</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,5 +6 @@
-&lt;ke_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/ke_pri&gt;
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;に就て&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;io;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -14,0 +11,4 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;に就て&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;sK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-22 07:11:49" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think に付いて[ needs to be visible.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -10 +10 @@
-&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;iK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;sK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-23 01:09:05" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think に付いて should be dropped. Standard use of 付く surely accounts for the overwhelming majority of that n-gram count.
I don't think the example on sense 2 is needed.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, prog</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -7,4 +6,0 @@
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;に付いて&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;sK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -22,0 +19,3 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;about&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;on&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;regarding&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -24 +22,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;regarding&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -29 +27 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;per (e.g. 100 yen per person)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;per&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-04-23 02:37:26" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>



View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml