<entry eid="2295332" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1504160</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>分布</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf13</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ぶんぷ</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf13</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>distribution</gloss>
</sense>
<history>
<audit time="2017-06-03 07:45:47" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Amen Lernsky</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>eji doesn't suggest any evidence for "dissemination".
also 散布's (風散布) main sense is "dissemination".
therefore i'd remove it.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>eij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -20 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>dissemination</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-06-04 00:30:27" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree. It's not in any of the JE glosses, nor is 分布 the target for the term in EJs.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-07 01:08:18" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>meikyo</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vi;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-03-21 17:22:20" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think "allocation" is a good fit. The JEs only have "distribution".</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-<gloss>allocation</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-03-22 03:40:05" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</history>
</entry>
Notes
- Click on the entry seq# to see all versions of the entry.
- ⇒,⇔,⇐ Denote cross references (xrefs). ⇒ shows an xref from this entry sense to some other entry. ⇐ shows an xref on some other entry that points to this one; to change, edit the other entry. ⇔ indicates two xrefs, one in each direction.
- Cross references marked with an asterisk (*) after the seq# denote a reference to an unapproved entry. These will disappear when the unapproved entry is approved.