<entry eid="2161765" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1330360</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>授与</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf21</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>じゅよ</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf21</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<gloss>awarding</gloss>
<gloss>conferment</gloss>
<gloss>granting</gloss>
<gloss>presentation</gloss>
</sense>
<history>
<audit time="2018-12-06 03:13:30" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>see KKrulak's submission at 2837483. 授與 isn't quite common enough to include here as an oK, is it?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>g ng
授與 703
授与 683386</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>granting</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-12-06 12:32:30" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think so.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -19 +19 @@
-<gloss>award</gloss>
+<gloss>awarding</gloss>
@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+<gloss>presentation</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-18 00:58:18" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Meikyo vt and vi additions to n,vs entries
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+<pos>&vt;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
</history>
</entry>
Notes
- Click on the entry seq# to see all versions of the entry.
- ⇒,⇔,⇐ Denote cross references (xrefs). ⇒ shows an xref from this entry sense to some other entry. ⇐ shows an xref on some other entry that points to this one; to change, edit the other entry. ⇔ indicates two xrefs, one in each direction.
- Cross references marked with an asterisk (*) after the seq# denote a reference to an unapproved entry. These will disappear when the unapproved entry is approved.