jmdict
1208920
Rejected
(id:
2051235)
<entry id="2051235" stat="R" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1208920</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>株</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf03</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かぶ</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf03</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&ctr;</pos>
<gloss>stock</gloss>
<gloss>share</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
<gloss>stump</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&ctr;</pos>
<gloss>root</gloss>
<gloss>rootstock</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&ctr;</pos>
<gloss>strain (of bacteria, etc.)</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
<gloss>tradeable rank</gloss>
<gloss>goodwill</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1694520">御株・おかぶ</xref>
<gloss>one's forte</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2011-07-02 18:41:07" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_detl>could be improved</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-07-03 01:36:01" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Daijirin has more readings and meanings, but I suspect they are bit historical. There share/stock meaning dominates these days.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Daij, GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,0 +16,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>くいぜ</reb>
+</r_ele>
@@ -17,0 +20,1 @@
+<stagr>かぶ</stagr>
@@ -20,1 +24,11 @@
-<gloss>stump (of tree)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>root</gloss>
+<gloss>rootstock</gloss>
+<gloss>stump</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<stagr>かぶ</stagr>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<gloss>goodwill</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-07-03 17:06:19" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>adding stuff from meikyo/gg5 that is presumably not arch. くいぜ is only limited to the stump sense and there are additional headwords for it, so it should probably be split out</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>koj, daij, gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,3 +16,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>くいぜ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -20,1 +17,0 @@
-<stagr>かぶ</stagr>
@@ -22,0 +18,2 @@
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<gloss>stock</gloss>
@@ -23,1 +21,0 @@
-<gloss>stock</gloss>
@@ -27,2 +24,1 @@
-<gloss>root</gloss>
-<gloss>rootstock</gloss>
+<s_inf>orig. meaning</s_inf>
@@ -32,1 +28,0 @@
-<stagr>かぶ</stagr>
@@ -34,0 +29,13 @@
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<gloss>root</gloss>
+<gloss>rootstock</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&ctr;</pos>
+<gloss>strain (of bacteria, etc.)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>tradeable rank</gloss>
@@ -36,0 +44,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1694520">お株</xref>
+<gloss>one's forte</gloss>
+</sense></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-07-04 00:08:27" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-11-16 15:27:39" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>株仲間</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-11-16 21:22:57" stat="R">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-23 06:19:51" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -46 +45,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1694520">お株</xref>
@@ -48,0 +48,5 @@
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
+<gloss>abbreviation for stock company (株式会社)</gloss>
+</sense></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-23 22:17:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>(a) please provide a case for this edit - references, examples, etc.
(b) why was the cross-reference to お株 removed?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -45,0 +46 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="1694520">御株・おかぶ</xref>
@@ -51 +52,3 @@
-<gloss>abbreviation for stock company (株式会社)</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1208980">株式会社</xref>
+<misc>&abbr;</misc>
+<gloss>stock company</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-10-30 04:31:01" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>In the absence of a reference or examples I'm dropping this edit.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -49,7 +48,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&n-suf;</pos>
-<xref type="see" seq="1208980">株式会社</xref>
-<misc>&abbr;</misc>
-<gloss>stock company</gloss>
-</sense></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-11-02 12:46:24" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_detl>duplicate entry: see https://www.edrdg.org/jmdictdb/cgi-bin/entr.py?svc=jmdict&sid=&q=1208920.1</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-11-02 18:05:20" stat="R">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>this is not a duplicate. both are entry ID 1208920; however, it appears that because an anonymous editor revived a rejected fork and Jim approved on that branch instead of rejecting, this one entry now has two approved branches. (if you search for 株, two entries will show.) this should not be able to happen, so it appears to be a database error. i will raise this on the mailing list so it can be fixed
i will try deleting the other forked branch; however, i suspect that it will delete the entire entry and it will need to be restored.
if it was you who revived the rejected branch, please do not do so again. edit off of the approved branches that represent the current entries only.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>