<entry id="2009139" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1391110</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>染み</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf42</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>しみ</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf42</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>シミ</reb>
<re_nokanji/>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<gloss>stain</gloss>
<gloss>spot</gloss>
<gloss>smudge</gloss>
<gloss>blot</gloss>
<gloss>smear</gloss>
<gloss>blotch</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2686250">肝斑</xref>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<s_inf>esp. シミ</s_inf>
<gloss>spot (on one's skin, e.g. chloasma, liver spot)</gloss>
<gloss>blemish</gloss>
<gloss>discoloration</gloss>
<gloss>freckle</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2012-02-26 08:41:17" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>koj, daij, gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -20,0 +20,12 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;smudge&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;blot&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;smear&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;blotch&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="2686250"&gt;肝斑&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;spot (on one's skin, e.g. chloasma, liver spot)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;blemish&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;discoloration&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;freckle&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-02-26 21:52:06" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-10-03 12:57:25" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus</upd_name>
<upd_refs>hard to compare hits but "シミ抜き” gets more hits than "染み抜き” 
(on bing), for example</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,0 +15,4 @@
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;シミ&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;re_nokanji/&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-10-03 23:29:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-07-03 11:52:03" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>luce</upd_name>
<upd_detl>the second sense probably [uk] as well</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>n-grams
しみ抜き	510
シミ抜き	915
染み抜き	492
しみだらけ	149
シミだらけ	282
染みだらけ	85
コーヒーのしみ	24
コーヒーのシミ	27
コーヒーの染み	29
しみがついて	118
シミがついて	245
染みがついて	99</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -21,0 +22 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-07-15 06:46:15" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-08-29 01:50:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>シミ is not explicitly in references, but Google images for it mostly show skin spots, whereas those for 染み are more general spots.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>G n-grams:
シミ	2308123
染み	701986
しみ	1867821</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -32,0 +33,2 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;esp. シミ&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-08-29 06:14:43" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-06-10 14:05:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>In KanjiDic 染 has the kun-readings 
  そ.める, -ぞ.め, -ぞめ, そ.まる, し.みる, じ.みる, し.み, -し.める
I think
  そ.まる、そ.める、し.みる、 し.み
should suffice.
The readings -ぞ.め, -ぞめ　are redundant
The reading じ.みる should be -じ.みる and is also redundant.
The reading -し.める is for 焚き染める and 煮染める which are quite rare.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-06-11 02:17:24" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree, (So do several kanwas.)</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>