<entry id="1973829" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1436470</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>梯形</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ていけい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1412590">台形</xref>
<s_inf>now usu. 台形</s_inf>
<gloss>trapezoid</gloss>
<gloss>trapezium</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-03-01 15:27:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Would it be helpful to have a note in cases like this? I don't think  [obs] is appropriate.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijs: "台形の旧称"</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1412590"&gt;台形&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;trapezium&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-02 02:24:23" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, there should be a way of saying that it's and old term and there are better ones. I'll see how this note goes.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>梯形	1199
台形	126033</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+&lt;s_inf&gt;now usu. 台形&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>