<entry id="1908225" stat="R" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1058720</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>桑港</keb>
<ke_inf>&ateji;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>サンフランシスコ</reb>
<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>サン・フランシスコ</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>そうこう</reb>
<re_inf>&ok;</re_inf>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<gloss>San Francisco</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-05-11 08:01:52" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;サン・フランシスコ&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-12-12 03:08:09" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I guess it's OK to count this as ateji?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,4 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;桑港&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;ateji;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -10,0 +15,4 @@
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;そうこう&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;ok;&lt;/re_inf&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
@@ -12,0 +21 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-12-13 00:00:26" stat="R">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think サンフランシスコ can really be regarded as te reading of 桑港. Better two entries. I've proposed this as a new entry.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>