jmdict
2821330
Active
(id:
1160142)
<entry id="1160142" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2821330</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>ユニバレ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1010350">ばれる・1</xref>
<xref type="see" seq="1010350">ばれる・1</xref>
<misc>&abbr;</misc>
<misc>&sl;</misc>
<gloss>being found out wearing (cheap) clothes from the clothing chain Uniqlo</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2014-08-14 00:49:57" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Been around since at least 2007.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>http://surrealu.blogspot.com.au/2009/01/japanese-slang-unibare.html
http://kotobank.jp/word/%E3%83%A6%E3%83%8B%E3%83%90%E3%83%AC
http://zokugo-dict.com/37yu/yunibare.htm
N-grams</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-08-15 04:35:18" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-08-15 12:51:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_detl>I think it's slighlty broader than just
the accusation. also, should it be marked
abbr considering it really is a kind of
neologism?
I think the note is not neceasary as there
is an xref to ばれる and Uniqlo is
mentioned in the definition</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>ユニバレしやすいアイテムTOP5とは?
http://www.fashionsnap.com/the-posts/2013-
10-05/yub5samuraielo/</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -8 +8,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&vs;</pos>
@@ -11,2 +12,2 @@
-<s_inf>from ユニクロ and バレる</s_inf>
-<gloss>Oh no! You're wearing Uniqlo!</gloss>
+<misc>&sl;</misc>
+<gloss>being found out wearing (cheap) clothes from the clothing chain Uniqlo</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-08-16 00:53:02" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, that broadens it.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>