<entry eid="1148939" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1364830</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>神秘</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf20</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>しんぴ</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf20</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
<gloss>mystery</gloss>
<gloss>mysteriousness</gloss>
<gloss>secret</gloss>
</sense>
<history>
<audit time="2013-10-27 03:55:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nils Roland Barth</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Fix POS (adj-na first), add “mystical” – there’s definitely
this nuance.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5, other entries</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -20,1 +20,2 @@
-<gloss>mystery</gloss>
+<gloss>mysterious</gloss>
+<gloss>mystical</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-10-27 04:53:57" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The refs all gloss it as a noun, and both the ngrams and a concordance I checked confirm its noun usage. I think that has to lead.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5, 新和英中辞典, etc.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +17,1 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -18,1 +19,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -20,2 +20,3 @@
-<gloss>mysterious</gloss>
-<gloss>mystical</gloss>
+<gloss>mystery</gloss>
+<gloss>mysteriousness</gloss>
+<gloss>secret</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
</history>
</entry>
Notes
- Click on the entry seq# to see all versions of the entry.
- ⇒,⇔,⇐ Denote cross references (xrefs). ⇒ shows an xref from this entry sense to some other entry. ⇐ shows an xref on some other entry that points to this one; to change, edit the other entry. ⇔ indicates two xrefs, one in each direction.
- Cross references marked with an asterisk (*) after the seq# denote a reference to an unapproved entry. These will disappear when the unapproved entry is approved.