jmdict 1613420 Active (id#1142288)
<entry eid="1142288" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict"> <ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp> <ent_seq>1613420</ent_seq> <k_ele> <keb>引受人</keb> </k_ele> <k_ele> <keb>引き受け人</keb> <ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf> </k_ele> <k_ele> <keb>引受け人</keb> <ke_inf>&io;</ke_inf> </k_ele> <r_ele> <reb>ひきうけにん</reb> </r_ele> <sense> <pos>&n;</pos> <xref type="see" seq="1613400" xk="引き受け" xr="ひきうけ">引き受け(ひきうけ)</xref> <gloss>guarantor</gloss> <gloss>acceptor (e.g. promissory note)</gloss> <gloss>underwriter (e.g. stock issue)</gloss> </sense> <history> <audit time="2013-06-10 23:34:24" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>All part of the one sense, I think. 引き受け人 gets 40k hits; 引受け人 2k.</upd_detl> <upd_refs>GG5, 新和英中辞典</upd_refs> <upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +6,6 @@ +&lt;/k_ele&gt; +&lt;k_ele&gt; +&lt;keb&gt;引き受け人&lt;/keb&gt; +&lt;/k_ele&gt; +&lt;k_ele&gt; +&lt;keb&gt;引受け人&lt;/keb&gt; @@ -12,0 +18,1 @@ +&lt;xref type="see" seq="1613400"&gt;引き受け・ひきうけ&lt;/xref&gt; @@ -13,0 +20,2 @@ +&lt;gloss&gt;acceptor (e.g. promissory note)&lt;/gloss&gt; +&lt;gloss&gt;underwriter (e.g. stock issue)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2013-06-17 00:30:14" stat="A" unap="true"> <upd_uid>rene</upd_uid> <upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>[io]? kind of unsightly and 引受人 is the only form listed in kokugos</upd_detl> <upd_diff>@@ -9,0 +9,1 @@ +&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;io;&lt;/ke_inf&gt; @@ -12,0 +13,1 @@ +&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;io;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff> </audit> <audit time="2013-06-17 02:22:45" stat="A"> <upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid> <upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name> <upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email> <upd_detl>I'm comfortable with the "io". Lack of okurigana standardization is odd and at times frustrating. I have trouble convincing some people in the lexicography community that multiple surface forms abound in Japanese and that there is often no accepted canonical form. To a German that can seem heretical.</upd_detl> </audit> </history> </entry>
View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmdictdb xml

Notes

  • Click on the entry seq# to see all versions of the entry.       
  • ⇒,⇔,⇐ Denote cross references (xrefs). ⇒ shows an xref from this entry sense to some other entry. ⇐ shows an xref on some other entry that points to this one; to change, edit the other entry. ⇔ indicates two xrefs, one in each direction.
  • Cross references marked with an asterisk (*) after the seq# denote a reference to an unapproved entry. These will disappear when the unapproved entry is approved.