Re: [edict-jmdict] moved entry still there ..

[Jim Breen <jimbreen@*********>]

On 23 July 2010 19:07, Jean-Luc Léger <reiga@dspnet.fr.eu.org> wrote:

> > Hmmm. Your email arrived about 30 min before today's version
> > was built. I just checked an there's no 2558420 entry.
>
> Well I thought that waiting a little more than 24h would be enough :D
> Anyway, today is okay.
>
> Except for one entry, the one with a nokanji reading and restrictions on
> kanji.
> http://www.edrdg.org/jmdictdb/cgi-bin/entr.py?svc=jmdict&sid=&q=1195060.1

That entry is a problem, as the exclusions were breaking the legacy
EDICT generator. Rather than rewrite it for one entry, I changed the "restr"
settings to comments. It means the old EDICT will get all three senses for
all kanji, but I don't think it's a huge issue.

Thanks

Jim

--
Jim Breen
Adjunct Snr Research Fellow, Clayton School of IT, Monash University
Treasurer: Hawthorn Rowing Club, Japanese Studies Centre
Graduate student: Language Technology Group, University of Melbourne