RE: [edict-jmdict] jmdict/jmnedict inconsistency

["Stuart McGraw" <smcg4191@********>]

Jim Breen wrote:
>[...]
> Hmmm. How about this:
> 
> If it contains ONLY characters from the set
> <hiragana, katakana, ヽ, ヾ, ゝ, ゞ, ー> AND
> it has at least one kana, it goes into the <reb>. All
> others go into the <keb>
> 
> > (An aside... what is the rule for numbers in readings,
> > should they be given as western-style digits (２１),
> > spelled out in kana (にじゅういち), both?, either? Does
> > it depend on the counter, 21っぷん、にじゅういっぷん？)
> 
> Strictly the ２１ should be in the <keb>, perhaps with
> 二十一 as well, and the matching にじゅういち in the <reb>.
> 
> Anything that is *purely* a reading or a kana-only formation
> goes in the <reb>. All others, go in the <keb>. Does that make
> sense?

OK, I think I've got it.  I was confused because I wasn't
sure which entries were intentional and which weren't.  
Thanks!