Re: [edict-jmdict] Another kanjidic radical question

["Jim Breen" <jimbreen@*********>]

2008/6/16 Stuart McGraw <smcg4191@frii.com>:
> According to kanjidic2, the character 麻 (u+9ebb) has
> the radical 53 (广). But according to Halpern and Unicode,
> the character is it's own radical (200). Who's right?

They are. It should be 200. No idea where the 53 came in.

> (Actually radical 200 in Halpern and Unicode looks like
> 麻 but with the diagonal "tree roots" not actually touching
> the "trunks" and looking more like　"儿" but Halpern gives
> 麻 as a variant.)

Cheers

Jim

-- 
Jim Breen
Honorary Senior Research Fellow
Clayton School of Information Technology,
Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/