[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [edict-jmdict] Re: Regarding the ENT_SEQ field in JMDICT



This is all way beside the point which is, as I'd said before,
I don't think the results obtainable would be worth the effort
I would have to put in to get them.

I've got 10,943 records that still haven't been completely
indexed and I'd rather be doing that than hunting a speculative
number of wild geese.