RE: [edict-jmdict] Examples file anomalies

["Stuart McGraw" <smcg4191@********>]

Jim Breen wrote:
> On 19/03/07, Stuart McGraw <smcg4191@frii.com> wrote:
> > Paul Blay wrote:
> > > 07/03/18 に Stuart McGraw<smcg4191@frii.com> さんは書きました:
> > > > Paul Blay wrote:
> > > > > A few of these seem to have valid entries that are not in the 'TempSUB' set.
> > > [...]
> > > > But the only way I had to check them was to look them up
> > > > manually in wwwjdic.
> > >
> > > Pending _new_ entries in Edict can be found
> > > http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/edictdb_pb2.gz
> >
> > Thanks, I didn't know (or had forgotten about, not sure which :-) that.
> > It will also be useful for the jmdict database project as a source for
> > loading up a lot of "pending approval" entries for testing the
> > approval process.
> 
> I don't think it's been publicised before. The more "public" exposure of pending
> words 
something missing here? :-)
>is in EDICT format. I could easily JMdictify that pending file if you like
> )just a line or two more in a script.)

If its easy to do, yes, I would appeciate that.  I am modifying the jmdict 
xml loader so that it will do multiple sequential bulk loads to the database, 
so it should be very easy pop a set of new words into the database.
But I probably won't be able to do anything with it until I get back (early 
to mid April).