Re: [edict-jmdict] bad entries in submissions

When I ask questions as you did (As I mentioned above I don't really know what is happening with the database project, is there a timescale for these events to happen?), I rapidly become persona non gratis. And I don't recall asking them too much more directly than you.

On 11/21/06, Ben Bullock <benkasminbullock@*********> wrote:

On 21/11/06, Jim Breen <Jim.Breen@**********************> wrote:

> I hope we'll have that sort of thing once there's a real database
> supporting these amendments.

I'm not really sure who's responsible for the database development or
what the progress of it is.

> In the meantime, Paul's suggestion of following up with an "amendment"
> of your own commenting on the prior one is a good one. Or you can
> just email me.

It's easy to forget to do something like that - if I am browsing the
page and I think "oh, that's wrong" I might send a correction but a
lot of the times I get distracted and forget to do it. The same
problem happened with edict entries in the past.

As I mentioned above I don't really know what is happening with the
database project, is there a timescale for these events to happen?
Also I would have thought that the database itself would not solve the
problem since the application would still need to be programmed.

B. Bullock